fbpx
MENU! CLOSE

Dispute Resolution

Dispute Resolution

The Litigation & Dispute Resolution team helps protect the client’s interests at the stage of pre-trial resolution of conflicts arising between clients, their counterparties, state authorities, and third parties. Also we may effectively protect you in court and arbitration, always adhering to standards of the rule of law and professionalism..

Howsoever we do like the courts and are one of the best there, if it is in the client’s interests to resolve this dispute peacefully, we work for the client’s benefit and not for the benefit of our own ambitions (which we have). At the same time, we must admit that our clients are so cool that they prefer to change their practices with us whenever there is an opportunity. For example, thanks to the perseverance and foresight of clients and not without our professionalism, we have demonstrative cases in domain disputes, admissibility, and propriety of electronic evidence, protection of intellectual property rights, proving damages for violations on the internet, and recognition of foreign arbitration awards.

Practice areas:

  • Advise clients.
  • Represent clients in international arbitrations.
  • Conduct negotiations at all levels and in different languages.
  • Create court practice on individual issues.
  • Represents clients in courts of various jurisdictions, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, the European Court of Human Rights.
  • Represent clients in pre-trial settlement of disputes (claim work, (in particular with Meta, Ukrainian media), procedures for appealing decisions in state bodies, appeals to the Verkhovna Rada Commissioner for Human Rights, etc.).

The most common categories of cases:

  • IТ-disputes (technology and contractual structure disputes in IT);
  • IP-disputes;
  • Corporate disputes;
  • domain disputes both under ADR and in national courts;
  • labor disputes;
  • disputes regarding the protection of cultural heritage;
  • disputes regarding the protection of business reputation and refutation of false information;
  • disputes regarding the appeal of regulations;
  • disputes regarding competitions for public service positions;
  • disputes against state bodies, local self-government bodies, in particular against the Ukrainian State Film Agency.
Nadia Yermiichuk

Other post

The good news in the case against the State Film Agency The good news in the case against the State Film Agency
It took 4 years, two rounds of jurisdiction determination, and even the liquidation of courts for the Supreme Court to issue final judgments in favor of our clients Andrii Khalpakhcha and Andrii Donchyk in the first two cases on the recovery of stipends for members of the first State Film Support Council. In total, we have eight such cases, and the rest are still on the way to cassation.

February 23, 2024 1 min

Insignificant cases: what the Constitutional Court missed Insignificant cases: what the Constitutional Court missed
On November 22, the Constitutional Court ruled on four constitutional claims regarding insignificant cases in the civil process. I was the author of one of these claims, so the comment below is inevitably my subjective and biased opinion. At the same time, I will try to react to the decision of the Constitutional Court rationally, in the sense that any court process is a rational, even if formalized, communication, and the court decision is not a dogma but an attempt to rationally convince the parties (in the first place) and the community (in the second place) in the correctness of the court’s conclusions. So, did the court manage to persuade Mykyta Yevstifeiev? Published by Dead Lawyers Society.

December 25, 2023 1 min

Successful success in our case of the Cycling Federation Successful success in our case of the Cycling Federation
We wanted to publish the news about the case we won in the Ukrainian Cycling Federation project much earlier. In early December, we learned that the Pivnichny Commercial Court of Appeal had finally (and hopefully finally) confirmed the legality of the FCU Conference back in 2019 in our main case (and we have only 11 of them on this project!).

December 19, 2023 1 min

CJEU decision and non-pecuniary damage in personal data cases CJEU decision and non-pecuniary damage in personal data cases
Let’s dream about a bright future. 2029. Ukraine is in the EU, Russian War Ship went f*ck itself (haha). Let’s say our Supreme Court appeals to the EU Court of Justice and asks for clarification on a few issues regarding the GDPR. The court is very interested in how to award non-pecuniary damage to people whose data was published online after a large-scale data breach as a result of a hacker attack.

December 18, 2023 1 min

Lutsk, drug addicts, pedophiles, LGBT people, Romani, and Nazis. What do they have in common? Lutsk, drug addicts, pedophiles, LGBT people, Romani, and Nazis. What do they have in common?
Have you ever heard of articles written to hear the opinions of your colleagues, to get support for your position, or to criticize it? We call them discussion articles or roast articles. We have long dreamed of trying to introduce this format, at least on our Facebook page. And now the time has finally come.

November 3, 2023 1 min

Domain Name Dispute Hromadske vs Skrypin: Case Files Domain Name Dispute Hromadske vs Skrypin: Case Files

July 27, 2016 1 min